Search once revolved around matching phrases. You optimized for “best CRM for startups”, stuffed it in the title, and waited for Google to rank you. But in the era of AI-generated answers, the kind you see in ChatGPT, Gemini, or Perplexity, visibility isn’t about keywords anymore. It’s about being recognized as an entity the model understands, trusts, and can cite.
When a user asks, “What’s the best AI visibility tool for brands?”, the model doesn’t look for keyword matches. It looks for entities: known organizations, products, and concepts with verifiable data and citations.
As Google famously put it when launching its Knowledge Graph, search is now about “things, not strings.” That same philosophy now governs AI assistants, except at a much deeper level.
Why AI models think in entities, not words
Large language models like GPT-4 and Gemini aren’t simply counting word frequencies. They generate text by reasoning over relationships, which brands are associated with which features, how entities connect, and which sources reinforce each fact.
In practice, that means:
- Keywords describe language.
- Entities describe knowledge.
AI doesn’t “see” CRM software as just a keyword. It sees a network of connected entities: Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, each linked to reviews, schema, and usage context.
If your site defines your entity clearly, using JSON-LD schema, concise explanations, and internal links, the model can anchor your brand to those relationships. Without that clarity, you’re just another noun in a 500-billion-token haystack.
A 2024 study, Knowledge Graphs for Enhancing Large Language Models, demonstrated that LLMs augmented with structured entity data improved accuracy, citation quality, and factual recall. In short: entities help models reason better, and reward the brands that provide structured facts.
Why keywords alone can’t earn you visibility
Keyword optimization worked when visibility meant “ranking.” But models no longer return a list of links, they synthesize an answer. If you’re not cited or mentioned, you don’t exist in that synthesis.
Consider these scenarios:
- You rank for a search keyword but aren’t cited in AI answers.
- You’re mentioned but the model links to a competitor’s site.
- You’re cited, but the wrong page (like your homepage) is referenced.
In all three, your keyword strategy fails because the model didn’t interpret your entity correctly.
This is why we built TAV — Trusted AI Visibility: a 0–100 score that measures how prominently and reliably your brand appears in AI answers, combining mention strength, citation accuracy, and trust factors.
What makes an entity “AI-ready”
1. A clear, concise definition
Start every key page with a one-sentence explanation of what your brand or product is. Models and knowledge graphs use those sentences as grounding data.
2. Structured data that matches meaning
Use schema markup that defines your entity type, Organization, SoftwareApplication, Product, Service. Include relationships like mainEntityOfPage, brand, sameAs, and about.
3. Linked context
Internal links show relationships between entities on your site. External citations (press, listings, profiles) reinforce your identity in the wider graph.
4. Extractable facts and Q&As
LLMs favor content that’s formatted like an answer, definitions, short facts, clear headers, and logical structure.
5. Consistency across systems
Your brand name, description, and schema should stay consistent across your site, LinkedIn, Crunchbase, and anywhere else models might pull context.
Entities in action: how AI decides what to cite
When a model generates an answer, it weighs multiple factors, what it “knows” from training, what it can retrieve from the web, and what structured data supports the claim.
As covered in Inside the Black Box: How AI Decides Which Brands to Cite, AI systems blend trust, recency, and citation density. A brand with clean entity markup and consistent evidence across its site is far more likely to be cited than one relying on keyword-stuffed copy.
Citations are signals of trust. They tell both the user and the model, “this is a credible source of the fact being stated.” If you want AI visibility, you must give the models clear reasons to trust and quote you.
How to measure if your entity strategy works
You can’t track this in Google Search Console, at least not yet. Instead, platforms like Karaya analyze how models actually describe and cite your brand in real AI runs across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity.
Metrics include:
- Mention rate: How often your brand name appears in model answers.
- Citation alignment: Whether the cited page matches the question’s intent.
- TAV score: Your composite trust and visibility rating.
- Volatility: How consistently models describe your brand across runs.
This entity-based measurement is the foundation of AI-first visibility, and it’s reshaping how marketing teams think about discovery and performance.
For a broader overview of this evolution, see The New Discovery Stack: Why Every Brand Should Be Optimizing for LLMs Now.
The takeaway
Keywords built search. Entities build answers.
If AI models can’t identify your brand as a distinct entity, with a definition, relationships, and proof, you’ll be invisible where decisions now happen.
This isn’t SEO with AI tacked on; it’s a new discipline. Your visibility depends not on how well you rank, but on whether the models know who you are.
Define your entity. Structure your data. Build the relationships that models can cite.
And when the next user asks an AI assistant a question in your category it’s the one that gets quoted.
Leave a Reply